Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-04-19 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2005-04-19 House Journal Page 1136 HB 54 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 54 "An Act relating to bail review." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 4DP 859 FN1: ZERO(COR) 859 FN2: ZERO(CRT) 859 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 859 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 6DP 3NR 1043 FN1: ZERO(COR) 1043 FN2: ZERO(CRT) 1043 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 1043 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 54(FIN) "An Act relating to bail review; relating to petitions for review by crime victims where the defendant has received a sentence below the sentencing range for the crime; relating to the qualifications of certain members of the Violent Crimes Compensation Board; 2005-04-19 House Journal Page 1137 relating to the introduction of the victim and the defendant or minor to the jury; amending Rule 27, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedures, and Rule 21, Alaska Delinquency Rules; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 54(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 54(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 54(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 54(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Absent: Chenault And so, CSHB 54(FIN) passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2005-04-19 House Journal Page 1138 CSHB 54(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.